Apple’s opposition to the presence of unverified and unofficial applications in the iPhone, despite the pressure of regulatory bodies


Apple’s opposition to the presence of unverified and unofficial applications in the iPhone, despite the pressure of regulatory bodies

Apple’s opposition to the presence of unverified and unofficial applications in the iPhone, despite the pressure of regulatory bodies

News unit EMGblog.com : Company Apple in a new, 16-page report recently published, he spoke and claimed his reasons for abandoning unverified and unofficial apps on the iPhone that the presence of these apps endangers the security and confidence of users. The report, titled “Building a Secure Ecosystem for Millions of Applications,” provides an overview of Apple’s current security processes and points to possible changes if regulations require applications to be sideloaded.

All the programs in the Apple store should Follow the instructions and rules of the company and be compatible with the app store review process. But if this practice changes, apps can fail to enforce the rules and regulations put in place to protect users. Therefore, according to the managers of the American company, the sideloading method will make users vulnerable to viruses and malware.

The term sideloading means installing a program in the form of a file with an IPA extension on one of Apple’s devices, which is done through methods such as jailbreak and bypassing some restrictions imposed by Apple for users. In this way, users of Apple products can download and install their desired programs not only with the help of the App Store, but also through other stores and web pages.

This report is part of the American company’s resistance against It is the legislators and critics who believe that applications should be allowed to operate outside the centralized framework of the App Store and install them independently on the iPhone. The U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee is expected to discuss Apple’s store policies in its review of several bills related to technology monopoly. According to Bloomberg, one of the bills, sponsored by David Cicilline, chairman of the antitrust subcommittee, may require Apple to agree to install apps independently of the company’s store.

In other regions, including the European Union, the proposed Digital Markets Act (DMA for short) could force Apple to accept the installation of unofficial and unapproved apps. According to the report of CNBC, the CEO of Apple previously announced that the literature used in this law, which is still being discussed, will probably oblige the company to accept such applications on the iPhone, and this will protect the security of Apple’s ecosystem. will destroy On the other hand, companies such as Epic Games, in their high-profile case with the Cupertino giant, have sought to issue a license for the independent installation of such programs from Apple.

Apple Currently it is possible It allows for the independent installation of unofficial and unverified apps on MacBook computers, but claims that this method is not effective for iPhone devices because more sensitive and personal information is stored on users’ phones. Craig Federighi, Apple’s senior vice president of software engineering, recently discussed the The court of this company with Epic Games argued that the implementation of the method used in Mac computers shows a level of malware installation. which is not acceptable and its use in mobile phones and iOS operating system will be disastrous.

According to a new report Apple “Allowing sideloading reduces the security of the iOS platform and exposes users to serious security risks not only in various app stores but also in the App Store.” Citing research that shows that various app stores on the Android platform (which enable the installation of standalone apps) are more likely to contain malicious code, the company believes that if this method is implemented in iOS, similar problems for Devices based on this ecosystem will also be created. Because such programs do not use Apple’s security and privacy features.

However, critics of Apple’s performance have rejected the claims of reduced security put forward by the company, because despite Apple’s reference to a group of 500 people Experts who review and update about 100,000 new programs every week, still many examples of problematic programs escape from these controls, and therefore, it is not possible to prevent the independent activity of programmers with this excuse. Plus, forcing developers to use the App Store means they often have to pay 30 percent of app sales or in-app purchases as commissions; What Cecilin previously called a kind of banditry.

Some other experts have also argued that the security of the iPhone is more related to the security capabilities of iOS, including the way applications are run in the test environment or in the term sandbox, than the review process by the App Store. Meanwhile, Apple claims in its report that the best protection structure relies on the combination of defense layers that are simultaneously formed by the review by the App Store and the internal security of the operating system.

According to the managers of the American giant, the permission to install Standalone apps outside of Apple’s framework will impact the platform’s billions of users. In addition, users may need to install an application outside the App Store for work or study, or may be unknowingly tricked into installing the app. Therefore, Apple claims that the sideloading method provides malware with more flexibility on how to attack iPhones. In fact, from the point of view of company managers, it is not just a matter of user choice, because eventually this issue will affect all iPhone users.

Finally, Apple believes that the implementation of this method will also harm the developers themselves. Because in the current situation, users easily get new and small developer programs from a secure platform, but if the conditions become such that it is possible to install programs from any source, this trust will disappear. had

Of course Apple besides this The report is lobbying directly with American lawmakers, and according to the New York Times, a call was recently made between Tim Cook and Speaker of the US House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, and Apple executives’ concerns about antitrust bills were discussed. In addition, in a virtual meeting with Margrethe Vestager, the head of the anti-monopoly department of the European Union, Cook also talked with her about this.

Previous Introducing the Phantom X, the first product of the Phantom brand under the Techno collection
Next IDC Forecast of Tablet and Chromebook Market in 2021 – Continued Growth Thanks to Corona

No Comment

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.